When will someone stand up to this president and tell him enough is enough? Is that all our tax money is good for? Wars? I wish Bush would ask for 46 billions to make sure our social security don't fall over, that our heath insurance is affordable, that our roads are clean, our bridges strong and our schools safe and high in standard. I hate the fact that my tax money helps shed human blood ... all for nothing and with no good reason at all. What a travesty of politics.Veto on Child health, but asking for 46 Billion for war ?the typical person who was deceived by the government media will say: "but wars help protect America's interest"
What a bunch of load! Is there even any proof to back up this claim?
The debt held by the public is over 9 trillion...a new record! Way to go folks. Keep devaluing your dollar you'll be on the streets in no time ;)
"If the American People ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around (the banks), will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered . . ."
--Thomas JeffersonVeto on Child health, but asking for 46 Billion for war ?
Government media-What the hell is that? The media is almost entirely liberally-biased. Anyway, half of Europe, Russia, saudi arabia and Egypt admitted to the existence of WMD production in Iraq. Storming this country was less a mindless act than others would lead you to believe. Enjoy the kool-aid!
Report Abuse
Veto on Child health, but asking for 46 Billion for war ?Well the left was trying to make me give up my insurance for Government substandard insurance, thank God the Veto held. I worked hard to get my coverage and I would have lost it due to not being able to afford both plans.Get an education and job good enough for you to get your own insurance. The Goverment is not your mom and dad and I do not want to pay for others mistakes.
Later.
This is the essence of the Bush Administration. Vote Democratic. Not Hillary though.Veto on Child health, but asking for 46 Billion for war ?National Defense is a Constitutional responsibility of the Federal government. paying for peoples health care is not mentioned in the Constitution so falls to the States. Why is this so hard for so many to understand? It's really a simple concept.,Veto on Child health, but asking for 46 Billion for war ?
Well, it seems that the Democratic controlled congress is willing to give him the money for the war but is going along with not paying for the health care. I guess I can assume that Democrats are war mongers and hate children.
This may be news to you but congress controls the money, they can say yeah or nay.
Blame Congress too. They keep letting him do it.Veto on Child health, but asking for 46 Billion for war ?
Nice rant. Do you feel better now? You sound like a Miss America contestant with about as much substance behind your desire for 'world peace'.
So head out to the Middle East Moon Unit and preach your desire for world peace to them because THAT is where the problem is, not here at home. We'd absolutely love to spend all that money on 'clean roads' just as long as we were confident that there weren't a bunch of sandal wearing Neanderthals bent on killing several thousand innocent Americans at their first opportunity.
Finally, ask yourself this question again. Why aren't they standing up to him? If it is so obvious, why don't they? You'd think it'd be simple to stand up to President Bush and force him to do what you think should be done. But it's not. And it's not because what he is doing has to be done. What he is doing is a top priority. They may say otherwise for political reasons but they're not so stupid as to think otherwise.
By the way, the schools are fine, thanks. They're handing out laptops to every kid in my district. The roads are fine and those that need health care get it. So settle down and let the big people handle it, 'kay?
Social security is the last of his worries, he will never have to draw from it because since he was elected president he will b paid for the rest of his life. As for the war, well not that I agree with us going to war, but our troops do need to b protected with gear they need, but 46 billion I really think that is an inflated figure. Bottom line this president is not concerned with the little people, might I add that it is the Veterans that have been the backbone of this country.....I wonder where the pres was for his term of service??? On the golf course or too busy being AWOL???? Childrens health care doesn't seem to b important to president bush at all because he wont get any cut backs from the drug companies, HMO's......But he can go ahead and screw the children of this country and the American service men. If you love your freedom, Thank an American veteran....NOT GW!!!!!!!!!!!
First of all, congress is proposing revenue articles like drunken sailors! Not a single plan of theirs isn't devoid of excessive pork-expense. This is the main reason why all of their proposals are being slammed. I'm not a major Bush fan, but the recent tax and spend healthcare plan was absurd. Do you realize that it included monies for those already with private insurance (better than half)? By your way of thinking government controlled anything is acceptable. Sorry, I'm personally not interested in nanny-state politics. I just wish someone would come up with a healthcare plan that doesn't have nonsense addendums for special interests. And yes, war is an ugly business, but I'd rather have professionals waging the war in the middle east than fearing what might happen fighting within our own borders. I suppose you would prefer to leave our troops without munitions on the field of battle? We are already sizing down our presence as the Iraqis become better trained.
Without the money for war , there will be no children, therefore no need for health care.
Bush has never made any sense to anyone that has an IQ over 90.
He thinks that spending an additional $35 billion on children's health care over a 5 year period is too much money, yet he thinks that flushing down the drain an additional $46 billion a year on top of the $150 billion a year that he is wasting is too much money. His bass ackward priorities are near treasonous.
when you spend OUR tax money on Americans the cons call it "socialism", yet, as you pointed out, when OUR money is spent half a world away to kill people its just fine. there is no way to fathom the con's thinking process (sic)
No comments:
Post a Comment